59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen BF Goodrich Advantage 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
4
30
8
Optimale Position
#3
#5
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
14.3
3.3
2.3
4.4
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
292
40
68
92

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Destination HP
74%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
86%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
62%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Destination HP
92%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
83%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
84%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
72%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Destination HP
73%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
66%
Komfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Destination HP
67%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
70%
Rollwiderstand
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Destination HP BF Goodrich Advantage 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Continental PremiumContact 7 Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.