59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Apollo Apterra HP gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Apollo
Apterra HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
7
4
7
Optimale Position
#10
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
5.5
3.3
4.4
3.8
2.3
Neuester Test
2017
2023
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
1
153
40
158
36
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Apollo Apterra HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Apollo Apterra HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
Apollo Apterra HP
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Apollo Apterra HP
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Apollo Apterra HP
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra HP
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra HP
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Apollo Apterra HP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Apollo Apterra HP Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Falken e.Ziex Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.